↓ Skip to main content

Suicide by Shotgun in Southeastern Minnesota

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited), September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Suicide by Shotgun in Southeastern Minnesota
Published in
Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited), September 2015
DOI 10.1111/1556-4029.12946
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Suicide by shotgun is a common method of suicide with high regional variation. We sought to describe their distinct, challenging features and provide demographic and risk characteristics. We reviewed 228 gunshot wounds autopsied at Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2014; of these, 75 (32.9%) were shotgun wounds. All were suicides and contact range. Ages ranged from 14 to 92 years old; of these, 97% were men. The majority involved the head (70.9%), were intraoral (48.2%), and had upward (73.2%) and backward (73.2%) directionality. Next most common was the chest (21.5%), with backward (94.1%) and downward (64.7%) directionality. Four involved multiple wounds. Wadding was recovered in 16 (21.3%) cases. Six (8.0%) had a survival period. Most (66.7%) took place at home. Seventy-one percent had a known psychiatric history; 32.4% had positive toxicology. Although contact range shotgun wounds cause severe destruction, entrance wound and other characteristic are identifiable with thorough scene, autopsy, and radiographic documentation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 16 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 16 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2026.
All research outputs
#21,431,810
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited)
#2,381
of 4,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,787
of 311,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forensic Sciences (Blackwell Publishing Limited)
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.