Microbial heterotrophic guilds in activated sludge wastewater treatment systems have complex population structures and functions. A previously proposed heterotrophic-specialist model states that heterotrophs consist of sub-guilds specialized in consuming specific classes of compounds, either readily degradable substrate (RDS) or slowly degradable substrate (SDS) according to current mathematical modeling practices for wastewater treatment processes. It follows from metabolic considerations that the levels of RNA and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) are correlated for strains of the same species growing in different environments; a conjecture previously tested. The proposed classification of heterotrophs into RDS or SDS consumers predicts that the same correlation would also be found across heterotrophic species in conventional activated sludge systems; this prediction was tested in the current study. The positive correlation between the RNA and PHA levels was observed in 9 conventional activated sludge plants in two independent sampling times and it was also found stable over a 6-month regular sampling period at one of these plants. Together, these results imply that the levels of RNA and PHA can be used to define heterotrophic-specialist sub-guilds. In order to gain insight in the species composition of the defined sub-guilds, flow cytometry cell sorting was used to further analyze one of the activated sludge samples. Four sorted sub-samples were obtained (high-RNA/high-PHA, low-RNA/high-PHA, high-RNA/low-PHA, and low-RNA/low-PHA), and the phylogenetic composition of each was determined using 16S rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing. Heterotrophic genera were identified across 12 phyla, and their representation in each sorted sub-sample showed that the high-RNA/high-PHA and low-RNA/low-PHA groups were most dissimilar. The enriched genera in these sorted sub-samples are suggested to represent the composition of heterotrophic-specialized sub-guilds defined by the kinetics of substrate consumption.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#5,771
of 11,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,315
of 341,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#100
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
