↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interplay between BRCA1 and RHAMM Regulates Epithelial Apicobasal Polarization and May Influence Risk of Breast Cancer
Published in
PLoS Biology, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A. Maxwell, Javier Benítez, Laia Gómez-Baldó, Ana Osorio, Núria Bonifaci, Ricardo Fernández-Ramires, Sylvain V. Costes, Elisabet Guinó, Helen Chen, Gareth J. R. Evans, Pooja Mohan, Isabel Català, Anna Petit, Helena Aguilar, Alberto Villanueva, Alvaro Aytes, Jordi Serra-Musach, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Carla B. Ripamonti, Bernardo Bonanni, Alessandra Viel, Anna Allavena, Loris Bernard, Paolo Radice, Eitan Friedman, Bella Kaufman, Yael Laitman, Maya Dubrovsky, Roni Milgrom, Anna Jakubowska, Cezary Cybulski, Bohdan Gorski, Katarzyna Jaworska, Katarzyna Durda, Grzegorz Sukiennicki, Jan Lubiński, Yin Yao Shugart, Susan M. Domchek, Richard Letrero, Barbara L. Weber, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Matti A. Rookus, J. Margriet Collee, Peter Devilee, Marjolijn J. Ligtenberg, Rob B. van der Luijt, Cora M. Aalfs, Quinten Waisfisz, Juul Wijnen, Cornelis E. P. van Roozendaal, HEBON, EMBRACE, Douglas F. Easton, Susan Peock, Margaret Cook, Clare Oliver, Debra Frost, Patricia Harrington, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Rosalind Eeles, Louise Izatt, Carol Chu, Diana Eccles, Fiona Douglas, Carole Brewer, Heli Nevanlinna, Tuomas Heikkinen, Fergus J. Couch, Noralane M. Lindor, Xianshu Wang, Andrew K. Godwin, Maria A. Caligo, Grazia Lombardi, Niklas Loman, Per Karlsson, Hans Ehrencrona, Anna von Wachenfeldt, SWE-BRCA, Rosa Bjork Barkardottir, Ute Hamann, Muhammad U. Rashid, Adriana Lasa, Trinidad Caldés, Raquel Andrés, Michael Schmitt, Volker Assmann, Kristen Stevens, Kenneth Offit, João Curado, Hagen Tilgner, Roderic Guigó, Gemma Aiza, Joan Brunet, Joan Castellsagué, Griselda Martrat, Ander Urruticoechea, Ignacio Blanco, Laima Tihomirova, David E. Goldgar, Saundra Buys, Esther M. John, Alexander Miron, Melissa Southey, Mary B. Daly, BCFR, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Alfons Meindl, Norbert Arnold, Helmut Deissler, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Christian Sutter, Dieter Niederacher, Evgeny Imyamitov, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonne, Sylvie Mazoyer, Carole Verny-Pierre, Laurent Castera, Antoine de Pauw, Yves-Jean Bignon, Nancy Uhrhammer, Jean-Philippe Peyrat, Philippe Vennin, Sandra Fert Ferrer, Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame, Isabelle Mortemousque, GEMO Study Collaborators, Amanda B. Spurdle, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, Sue Healey, kConFab, Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff, Marc Vidal, Stephen B. Gruber, Conxi Lázaro, Gabriel Capellá, Lesley McGuffog, Katherine L. Nathanson, Antonis C. Antoniou, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Markus C. Fleisch, Víctor Moreno, Miguel Angel Pujana

Abstract

Differentiated mammary epithelium shows apicobasal polarity, and loss of tissue organization is an early hallmark of breast carcinogenesis. In BRCA1 mutation carriers, accumulation of stem and progenitor cells in normal breast tissue and increased risk of developing tumors of basal-like type suggest that BRCA1 regulates stem/progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the function of BRCA1 in this process and its link to carcinogenesis remain unknown. Here we depict a molecular mechanism involving BRCA1 and RHAMM that regulates apicobasal polarity and, when perturbed, may increase risk of breast cancer. Starting from complementary genetic analyses across families and populations, we identified common genetic variation at the low-penetrance susceptibility HMMR locus (encoding for RHAMM) that modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA1, but probably not BRCA2, mutation carriers: n = 7,584, weighted hazard ratio ((w)HR) = 1.09 (95% CI 1.02-1.16), p(trend) = 0.017; and n = 3,965, (w)HR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.94-1.16), p(trend) = 0.43; respectively. Subsequently, studies of MCF10A apicobasal polarization revealed a central role for BRCA1 and RHAMM, together with AURKA and TPX2, in essential reorganization of microtubules. Mechanistically, reorganization is facilitated by BRCA1 and impaired by AURKA, which is regulated by negative feedback involving RHAMM and TPX2. Taken together, our data provide fundamental insight into apicobasal polarization through BRCA1 function, which may explain the expanded cell subsets and characteristic tumor type accompanying BRCA1 mutation, while also linking this process to sporadic breast cancer through perturbation of HMMR/RHAMM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 10%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,337,263
of 27,647,339 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#9,341
of 11,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,078
of 160,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#37
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,647,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.