↓ Skip to main content

Flavor Capsule Variants’ Performance in a “Dark Market”: Implications for Standardized Packaging

Overview of attention for article published in Nicotine & Tobacco Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Flavor Capsule Variants’ Performance in a “Dark Market”: Implications for Standardized Packaging
Published in
Nicotine & Tobacco Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1093/ntr/nty158
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

By increasing excise taxes, eliminating tobacco marketing and requiring standardised (plain) packaging of tobacco products, governments internationally have reduced smoking's allure. Yet product innovations, such as flavour capsule variants (FCVs), remain unregulated and may appeal to non-smokers. We examined the growth of FCVs in a country with a progressive policy environment. Each year, New Zealand tobacco companies must provide details of the number of cigarette sticks released for each brand and variant to the Ministry of Health. We used this information to analyse FCVs' performance for British American Tobacco (BAT) and Philip Morris International (PMI), which account for a large proportion of New Zealand tobacco sales. We report the quantity released of each variant and share of parent brand portfolio, and examine growth patterns within the premium, every-day and value market sub-sections. BAT introduced FCVs in 2012 and by 2014 offered FCVs in all market sub-sections; PMI introduced a Marlboro FCV in 2014. FCVs grew rapidly relative to unflavoured variants and, by 2017, represented nearly ten percent of BAT's product portfolio and over three percent of PMI's product portfolio. By 2017, FCVs accounted for more than a third of the Dunhill sticks released, 14% of Holiday, and 17% of Pall Mall. FCVs' rapid growth may have reduced declines in the numbers of sticks released. Policy makers should disallow FCV innovations, which offer no health benefits to smokers and may instead attract non-smokers to smoking. Where timely, these regulations could be incorporated into standardised packaging policies. FCVs have grown quickly in countries with comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions, which suggests tobacco companies are now focussing on novel product designs to attract new smokers. Standardised packaging regulations could address both external packaging and stick design innovations, such as FCVs; alternatively, specific regulations prohibiting FCVs may be required.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,285,886
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Nicotine & Tobacco Research
#900
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,764
of 371,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nicotine & Tobacco Research
#20
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.