↓ Skip to main content

Interface Passivation and Trap Reduction via a Solution-Based Method for Near-Zero Hysteresis Nanowire Field-Effect Transistors

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interface Passivation and Trap Reduction via a Solution-Based Method for Near-Zero Hysteresis Nanowire Field-Effect Transistors
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, September 2015
DOI 10.1021/acsami.5b07140
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this letter we demonstrate a solution-based method for a one-step deposition and surface passivation of the as-grown silicon nanowires. Using N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as a mild oxidizing agent, nanowires' surface traps density was reduced by over two orders of magnitude from 1x1013 cm-2 in pristine NWs to 3.7x1010 cm-2 in DMF treated NWs, leading to a dramatic hysteresis reduction in nanowire FETs from up to 32V to a near-zero hysteresis. The change of polyphenylsilane nanowire shell stoichiometric composition was confirmed by XPS analysis showing 35% increase in fully oxidized Si4+ species for DMF-treated nanowires compared to dry NW powder. Additionally, shell oxidation effect induced by DMF resulted is more stable NW FET performance with steady transistor currents and only 1.5V hysteresis after 1000 hours air exposure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 41%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 35%
Physics and Astronomy 3 18%
Materials Science 3 18%
Chemical Engineering 2 12%
Chemistry 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,291,564
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#3,230
of 17,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,240
of 274,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#68
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.