↓ Skip to main content

Active moss biomonitoring for extensive screening of urban air pollution: Magnetic and chemical analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active moss biomonitoring for extensive screening of urban air pollution: Magnetic and chemical analyses
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordana Vuković, Mira Aničić Urošević, Zoya Goryainova, Miodrag Pergal, Sandra Škrivanj, Roeland Samson, Aleksandar Popović

Abstract

In this study, active magnetic biomonitoring of moss for particulate air pollution and an assessment of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were performed for the entire metropolitan area of Belgrade. Two mosses, Sphagnum girgensohnii (a species of the most recommended biomonitoring moss genus) and Hypnum cupressiforme (a common moss in the study area), were used. During the summer of 2013, moss bags were exposed at 153 sampling sites, forming a dense network of sites. A type II regression model was applied to test the interchangeable use of the two moss species. Significantly higher levels of all measured pollutants were recorded by S. girgensohnii in comparison with H. cupressiforme. Based on the results, the mosses could not be interchangeably used in urban areas, except for the biomonitoring of Cu. Nevertheless, according to the relative accumulation factors obtained for both moss species, similar city zones related to high, moderate and low levels of air pollution were distinguished. Moreover, new pollution hotspots, omitted by regulatory monitoring, were identified. The results demonstrate that moss magnetic analysis represents an effective first step for obtaining an overview of particulate air pollution before more expensive chemical analyses. Active moss biomonitoring could be applied as a pragmatic approach for optimizing the representativeness of regulatory monitoring networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Chemistry 6 8%
Engineering 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#23,082
of 29,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,773
of 279,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#128
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.