↓ Skip to main content

Epstein–Barr Virus MicroRNAs Are Evolutionarily Conserved and Differentially Expressed

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epstein–Barr Virus MicroRNAs Are Evolutionarily Conserved and Differentially Expressed
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, March 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 249 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Master 22 8%
Professor 16 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 46 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,274,963
of 33,276,949 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#1,830
of 10,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,958
of 119,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,276,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.