↓ Skip to main content

A Multisensory Network for Olfactory Processing

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Multisensory Network for Olfactory Processing
Published in
Current Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.060
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Primary gustatory cortex (GC) is connected (both mono- and polysynaptically) to primary olfactory (piriform) cortex (PC)-connections that might be hypothesized to underlie the construction of a "flavor" percept when both gustatory and olfactory stimuli are present. Here we use multisite electrophysiology and optical inhibition of GC neurons (GCx, produced via infection with ArchT) to demonstrate that, indeed, during gustatory stimulation, taste-selective information is transmitted from GC to PC. We go on to show that these connections impact olfactory processing even in the absence of gustatory stimulation: GCx alters PC responses to olfactory stimuli presented alone, enhancing some and eliminating others, despite leaving the path from nasal epithelium to PC intact. Finally, we show the functional importance of this latter phenomenon, demonstrating that GCx renders rats unable to properly recognize odor stimuli. This sequence of findings suggests that sensory processing may be more intrinsically integrative than previously thought.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 42 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Psychology 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,929,553
of 30,017,478 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#12,432
of 16,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,968
of 290,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#152
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,017,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.