↓ Skip to main content

Video Captions Benefit Everyone

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 315)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
58 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
82 X users
reddit
34 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Video Captions Benefit Everyone
Published in
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, October 2015
DOI 10.1177/2372732215602130
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Video captions, also known as same-language subtitles, benefit everyone who watches videos (children, adolescents, college students, and adults). More than 100 empirical studies document that captioning a video improves comprehension of, attention to, and memory for the video. Captions are particularly beneficial for persons watching videos in their non-native language, for children and adults learning to read, and for persons who are D/deaf or hard of hearing. However, despite U.S. laws, which require captioning in most workplace and educational contexts, many video audiences and video creators are naïve about the legal mandate to caption, much less the empirical benefit of captions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 249 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 12%
Researcher 17 7%
Lecturer 16 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 121 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 25 10%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Computer Science 19 8%
Arts and Humanities 17 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 123 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 574. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2026.
All research outputs
#52,434
of 34,606,677 outputs
Outputs from Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
#3
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#447
of 312,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,606,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.