↓ Skip to main content

Minimizing Blood Transfusion in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Through a Multimodal Approach

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Minimizing Blood Transfusion in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Through a Multimodal Approach
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.025
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We introduced a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach to perioperative blood management aimed at reducing blood transfusions in primary knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty. The protocol included (1) preoperative hemoglobin optimization through a multidisciplinary approach, (2) minimization of perioperative blood loss, and (3) adherence to evidence-based transfusion guidelines. Evaluation of 1010 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA (488) or THA (522) was performed. A significant reduction in the overall transfusion rate (1.4% vs 17.9%, P<.0001) resulted after algorithm introduction, when compared with the 1814 previous patients. Zero (0%) TKA and 4 (0.8%) THA patients adherent to protocol, and 4/488 (0.8%) TKA and 10/522 (1.9%) THA patients overall received transfusions. Adoption of a multimodal blood management algorithm can significantly reduce blood transfusions in primary joint arthroplasty.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Other 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,766,793
of 26,872,864 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#3,433
of 4,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,077
of 277,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,872,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.