↓ Skip to main content

Ruthenium(II) p-cymene complex bearing 2,2′-dipyridylamine targets caspase 3 deficient MCF-7 breast cancer cells without disruption of antitumor immune response

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ruthenium(II) p-cymene complex bearing 2,2′-dipyridylamine targets caspase 3 deficient MCF-7 breast cancer cells without disruption of antitumor immune response
Published in
Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran N Kaluđerović, Tamara Krajnović, Miljana Momcilovic, Stanislava Stosic-Grujicic, Sanja Mijatović, Danijela Maksimović-Ivanić, Evamarie Hey-Hawkins

Abstract

[Ru(η(6)-p-cym)Cl{dpa(CH2)4COOEt}][PF6] (cym=cymene; dpa=2,2'-dipyridylamine; complex 2) was prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, IR and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, as well as ESI-MS and X-ray structural analysis. The structural analog without a side chain [Ru(η(6)-p-cym)Cl(dpa)][PF6] (1) as well as 2 were investigated in vitro against 518A2, SW480, 8505C, A253 and MCF-7 cell lines. Complex 1 is active against all investigated tumor cell lines while the activity of compound 2 is limited only to caspase 3 deficient MCF-7 breast cancer cells, however, both are less active than cisplatin. As CD4(+)Th cells are necessary to trigger all the immune effector mechanisms required to eliminate tumor cells, besides testing the in vitro antitumor activity of 1 and 2, the effect of ruthenium(II) complexes on the cells of the adaptive immune system have also been evaluated. Importantly, complex 1 applied in concentrations which were effective against tumor cells did not affect immune cell viability, nor did exert a general immunosuppressive effect on cytokine production. Thus, beneficial characteristics of 1 might contribute to the overall therapeutic properties of the complex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Serbia 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
#1,634
of 1,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,557
of 280,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.