A Central Hyporeflective Subretinal Lucency Correlates With a Region of Focal Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography in Eyes With Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.
Published in
Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, September 2015
To correlate the appearance of a hyporeflective lucency on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with a focal leak on fluorescein angiography (FA) in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
Multimodal imaging of 18 patients with CSC who had hyperreflective fibrin surrounding a hyporeflective lucency on SD-OCT was analyzed to investigate any potential correlation with an active leak on FA. The lucent area was evaluated using en face imaging and followed for resolution of the active leak.
High-resolution SD-OCT images of the lucency were found to correlate with the active leak. In certain cases, the lucent area could be visualized as communicating with a defect in a pigment epithelial detachment. En face imaging of the lucency revealed a smoke-stack appearance, and resolution of the leak correlated with the disappearance of the lucency on SD-OCT.
Visualization of a lucency within surrounding fibrin may suggest an active leak. En face imaging of the lucency may provide insight into the pathophysiology of the smoke-stack leak on FA. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46:832-836.].
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,881,557
of 27,383,327 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
#852
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,285
of 278,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,383,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
