↓ Skip to main content

Assessing plant-available glyphosate in contrasting soils by diffusive gradient in thin-films technique (DGT)

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing plant-available glyphosate in contrasting soils by diffusive gradient in thin-films technique (DGT)
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.221
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Glyphosate represents one quarter of global herbicide sales, with growing interest in both its fate in soils and potential to cause non-target phytotoxicity to plants. However, assessing glyphosate bioavailability to plants from soil residues remains challenging. Here we demonstrate that the diffusive gradient in thin-films technique (DGT) can effectively measure available glyphosate across boundary conditions typical of the soil environment: pH 4-9, P concentrations of 20-300 μg P L-1 and NaHCO3 concentrations of 10-1800 mg L-1. In this study, four soils with different glyphosate sorption properties were dosed with up to 16 mg kg-1 of glyphosate and phytotoxicity to wheat and lupin was measured against the DGT-glyphosate concentrations. An improved dose response curve was obtained for root elongation of wheat and lupin across soil types when DGT-glyphosate was used instead of alkaline-extractable (i.e., total extractable) glyphosate. Total extractable glyphosate concentrations of 2.6 and 5.0 mg glyphosate kg-1 in the sandy Tenosol, equivalent to 2.9 and 6.5 μg L-1 DGT-extractable glyphosate, reduced the root length of lupins (but not wheat) by 32-36% compared with the untreated control. DGT is therefore a promising method for assessing phytotoxic levels of glyphosate across different soils.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 4 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Chemistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#12,253,093
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#15,440
of 36,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,888
of 371,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#359
of 789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.