↓ Skip to main content

Genetic predisposition to obesity widens and skews the BMI distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genetic predisposition to obesity widens and skews the BMI distribution
Published in
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genetic studies of BMI have largely focused on how average BMI changes with SNPs or polygenic risk scores (PRS). We examine the effects of a BMI PRS on changes in BMI percentiles, range, and skewness using quantile regression and US nationally representative data from the Health and Retirement Survey. We find that the BMI PRS is associated with meaningfully larger weight increases at higher than lower BMI percentiles; the 90th BMI percentile increases by 4.7 units with a one SD increase in the PRS compared to 1.5 units at the 10th percentile (both effects individually significant and significantly different from each other p≤0.0001). Our results suggest that PRS effects at average BMI mask substantial heterogeneity for individuals ranking at different BMI percentiles and that genetic effects are associated with greater spread and right skewness of the BMI distribution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,852,160
of 27,788,803 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
#344
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,990
of 344,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.