↓ Skip to main content

Missing Pieces in the Puzzle of Plant MicroRNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Plant Science, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Missing Pieces in the Puzzle of Plant MicroRNAs
Published in
Trends in Plant Science, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Plant microRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulatory switches. Recent advances have revealed many regulatory layers between the two essential processes, miRNA biogenesis and function. However, how these multilayered regulatory processes ultimately control miRNA gene regulation and connects miRNAs and plant responses with the surrounding environment is still largely unknown. In this opinion article, we propose that the miRNA pathway is highly dynamic and plastic. The apparent flexibility of the miRNA pathway in plants appears to be controlled by a number recently identified proteins and poorly characterized signaling cascades. We further propose that altered miRNA accumulation can be a direct consequence of the rewiring of interactions between proteins that function in the miRNA pathway, an avenue that remains largely unexplored.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
New Zealand 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 121 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 28%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,185,733
of 27,629,830 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Plant Science
#1,459
of 2,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,573
of 291,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Plant Science
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,629,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.