↓ Skip to main content

Are the mutans streptococci still considered relevant to understanding the microbial etiology of dental caries?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Are the mutans streptococci still considered relevant to understanding the microbial etiology of dental caries?
Published in
BMC Oral Health, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12903-018-0595-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mutans streptococci were once the primary focus of research dedicated to understanding the etiology of dental caries. That focus has now shifted to an emphasis on the ecological balances and complexities within the entirety of the plaque microbiome. Within that framework there are considerable differences of opinion regarding the importance and relative contributions of the mutans streptococci. This article explores the basis for the various viewpoints, the limitations of current knowledge, and the confounders that make it difficult to arrive at a consensus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Researcher 12 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 96 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 107 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,395,396
of 32,099,977 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#115
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,088
of 358,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,099,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.