↓ Skip to main content

Factors Associated With Reintubation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Quality Management in Health Care, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Factors Associated With Reintubation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
Quality Management in Health Care, October 2015
DOI 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000069
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increase morbidity, mortality, and health care costs in COPD patients. Patients who require mechanical ventilation and fail extubation often have longer hospital stays and/or increased mortality. Determining predictors to identify patients who might require reintubation could help respiratory care teams manage these patients better. We retrospectively reviewed data of COPD patients over a 3-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with acute exacerbations of COPD, age more than 45 years, and patients on mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were ventilated via tracheostomy, unplanned extubation, and reintubation for reasons other than respiratory failure. This study included 88 patients; 61 patients were successfully extubated, 11 patients were extubated and required reintubation, and 16 patients were not extubated during their intensive care unit stay. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the patients with successful extubation and failed extubation. Patients with successful extubation were more likely to have a "good cough" assessment and to not receive any sedatives or analgesics in the 24 hours prior to extubation than patients who failed extubation (P < .05). Multiple variable logistic regression demonstrated that reintubation was significantly associated with sedatives/analgesics given prior to extubation (odds ratio = 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-60.8). Intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, tracheostomy events, and mortality rates were higher in the reintubation group (P < .001). Sedative and analgesic drug use prior to extubation was associated with more frequent reintubation in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. This study suggests that the judicious withdrawal of sedatives prior to extubation may reduce reintubations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Other 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Librarian 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Quality Management in Health Care
#344
of 722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,264
of 286,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality Management in Health Care
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 722 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.