You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth stress response to sea level rise in species with contrasting functional traits: A case study in tidal freshwater forested wetlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental & Experimental Botany, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.07.023 |
| Authors |
Lu Zhai, Ken W. Krauss, Xin Liu, Jamie A. Duberstein, William H. Conner, Donald L. DeAngelis, Leonel d.S.L. Sternberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,208,539
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Environmental & Experimental Botany
#35
of 964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,759
of 365,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental & Experimental Botany
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.