↓ Skip to main content

Moral distress and moral courage in everyday nursing practice.

Overview of attention for article published in Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 152)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Moral distress and moral courage in everyday nursing practice.
Published in
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, March 2011
DOI 10.3912/ojin.vol16no02ppt03
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this article the author examines the concepts of moral distress and moral courage within the context of nursing practice. Examples of challenging healthcare situations from the United Kingdom and Ireland are discussed in the light of the examination of these two concepts. The examples illuminate features of healthcare situations that need to be considered in relation to different organisational and cultural contexts. This requires an understanding of the complexity of clinical contexts and an appreciation of the fallibility and vulnerability of nurses and other practitioners. The goal of this article is to encourage healthcare organisations to create supportive structures and sensitive leadership that will enhance moral courage in the work setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 42 28%
Unknown 42 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Psychology 9 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 48 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,300,572
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
#31
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,583
of 161,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them