↓ Skip to main content

Degradation and remobilization of endogenous retroviruses by recombination during the earliest stages of a germ-line invasion

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
47 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Degradation and remobilization of endogenous retroviruses by recombination during the earliest stages of a germ-line invasion
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1807598115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#220,281
of 34,795,682 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,020
of 119,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,632
of 372,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#52
of 891 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,795,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 891 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.