↓ Skip to main content

Dissection of NT3 functions in vivo by gene replacement strategy.

Overview of attention for article published in Development (09501991), November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dissection of NT3 functions in vivo by gene replacement strategy.
Published in
Development (09501991), November 2001
DOI 10.1242/dev.128.21.4315
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of the peripheral nervous system is governed in part by a family of neurotrophic factors that signal through Trk tyrosine kinase receptors. Neurotrophin 3 (NT3) ablation in mice causes a more severe neuronal phenotype than deletion of its receptor TrkC, suggesting that NT3 acts also through other non-preferred Trk receptors. To study the role of low-affinity ligand receptor interactions in vivo, we have replaced the Nt3 gene with the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a TrkB ligand. As in NT3 and TrkC null mice, the proprioception system of these mutants failed to assemble. However, sensory fiber projections in the embryonic spinal cord suggest chemotropic effects of BDNF in vivo. In the dorsal root ganglia, the developmental dynamic of neuron numbers demonstrates that NT3 is required for activation of TrkB during neurogenesis and that TrkA is required during target tissue innervation. In the inner ear, the ectopic BDNF rescued the severe neuronal deficits caused by NT3 absence, indicating that TrkB and TrkC activate equivalent pathways to promote survival of cochlear neurons. However, specific increased innervation densities suggest unique functions for BDNF and NT3 beyond promoting neuronal survival. This mouse model has allowed the dissection of specific spatiotemporal Trk receptor activation by NT3. Our analysis provides examples of how development can be orchestrated by complex high- and low-affinity interactions between ligand and receptor families.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Portugal 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 36 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 32%
Neuroscience 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Development (09501991)
#6,523
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,690
of 66,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development (09501991)
#35
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.