Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Results From the ROADMAP Study

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, October 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 10 X users

facebook: 1 Facebook page
guideline: 4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley: 344 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 10 X posts from 10 X users, with an upper bound of 152,011 followers.

When you read the famous study again and found that it was actually written by my boss 😆 Good evidence to do LVAD in advanced HF w NYHA Class IIIb/IV (not on inotropes). https://t.co/YAQLqV71DE

Hey, #biom4180 here's a study assessing the comparative effectiveness of the LVAD that was mentioned this morning: https://t.co/x4Updj5z9M

Consider LVAD earlier, for non inotrope dependent HF patients. https://t.co/xFH5Ke0ML4

Risk Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management... @jaccjournals https://t.co/LYVBp9yEIe

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 6 additional X posts.