↓ Skip to main content

Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Žagubica Springs – Hydrological Heritage of Serbia

Overview of attention for article published in Open Geosciences, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Žagubica Springs – Hydrological Heritage of Serbia
Published in
Open Geosciences, June 2018
DOI 10.1515/geo-2018-0015
Authors

Ðurđa Miljković, Sanja Božić, Ljupče Miljković, Slobodan B. Marković, Tin Lukić, Mlađen Jovanović, Dajana Bjelajac, Đorđije A. Vasiljević, Miroslav D. Vujičić, Branko Ristanović

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 31%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Open Geosciences
#177
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,527
of 328,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Geosciences
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.