↓ Skip to main content

Initial results on energy resolution of the NEXT-White detector

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Instrumentation, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Initial results on energy resolution of the NEXT-White detector
Published in
Journal of Instrumentation, October 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10020
Authors

J. Renner, P. Ferrario, G. Martínez-Lema, F. Monrabal, A. Para, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas, C. Adams, V. Álvarez, L. Arazi, C.D.R. Azevedo, K. Bailey, F. Ballester, J.M. Benlloch-Rodríguez, F.I.G.M. Borges, A. Botas, S. Cárcel, J.V. Carrión, S. Cebrián, C.A.N. Conde, J. Díaz, M. Diesburg, J. Escada, R. Esteve, R. Felkai, A.F.M. Fernandes, L.M.P. Fernandes, A.L. Ferreira, E.D.C. Freitas, J. Generowicz, A. Goldschmidt, D. González-Díaz, R. Guenette, R.M. Gutiérrez, K. Hafidi, J. Hauptman, C.A.O. Henriques, A.I. Hernandez, J.A. Hernando Morata, V. Herrero, S. Johnston, B.J.P. Jones, M. Kekic, L. Labarga, A. Laing, P. Lebrun, N. López-March, M. Losada, R.D.P. Mano, J. Martín-Albo, A. Martínez, A.D. McDonald, C.M.B. Monteiro, F.J. Mora, J. Muñoz Vidal, M. Musti, M. Nebot-Guinot, P. Novella, D.R. Nygren, B. Palmeiro, J. Pérez, F. Psihas, M. Querol, J. Repond, S. Riordan, L. Ripoll, J. Rodríguez, L. Rogers, C. Romo-Luque, F.P. Santos, J.M.F. dos Santos, A. Simón, C. Sofka, M. Sorel, T. Stiegler, J.F. Toledo, J. Torrent, J.F.C.A. Veloso, R. Webb, J.T. White, N. Yahlali

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Professor 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 33%
Engineering 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Instrumentation
#1,223
of 1,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,341
of 350,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Instrumentation
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,740 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.