↓ Skip to main content

Adverse childhood experiences and trauma informed care: the future of health care

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
864 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adverse childhood experiences and trauma informed care: the future of health care
Published in
Pediatric Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/pr.2015.197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Resmiye Oral, Marizen Ramirez, Carol Coohey, Stephanie Nakada, Amy Walz, Angela Kuntz, Jenna Benoit, Corinne Peek-Asa

Abstract

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are related to short- and long-term negative physical and mental health consequences among children and adults. Studies of the last three decades on ACEs and traumatic stress have emphasized their impact and the importance of preventing and addressing trauma across all service systems utilizing universal systemic approaches. Current developments on the implementation of trauma informed care in a variety of service systems call for the surveillance of trauma, resiliency, functional capacity and health impact of ACEs. Despite such efforts in adult medical care, early identification of childhood trauma in children still remains a significant public health need. This article reviews childhood adversity and traumatic toxic stress, presents epidemiologic data on the prevalence of ACEs and their physical and mental health impacts, and discusses intervention modalities for prevention.Pediatric Research (2015); doi:10.1038/pr.2015.197.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 864 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 860 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 14%
Researcher 82 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 81 9%
Student > Bachelor 71 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 8%
Other 141 16%
Unknown 298 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 16%
Psychology 132 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 98 11%
Social Sciences 86 10%
Neuroscience 27 3%
Other 57 7%
Unknown 330 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2024.
All research outputs
#774,485
of 32,567,093 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#143
of 7,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,016
of 307,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#4
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,567,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.