You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Timescales of magmatic differentiation from alkali basalt to trachyte within the Harrat Rahat volcanic field, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00410-018-1495-9 |
| Authors |
Mark E. Stelten, Drew T. Downs, Hannah R. Dietterich, Gail A. Mahood, Andrew T. Calvert, Thomas W. Sisson, Hani Zahran, Jamal Shawali |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 83% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#185
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,308
of 332,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.