↓ Skip to main content

タイリクモモンガ用樹洞トラップの有効性

Overview of attention for article published in Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
タイリクモモンガ用樹洞トラップの有効性
Published in
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2015
DOI 10.11238/mammalianscience.55.53
Authors

浅利 裕伸

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#227
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,311
of 277,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.