↓ Skip to main content

Physical Fitness of Police Academy Cadets

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physical Fitness of Police Academy Cadets
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, May 2016
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001229
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Police academies traditionally emphasize the importance of being physically fit. The purpose of this research was to determine cadet baseline physical fitness characteristics and assess effectiveness of a 16-week training program. Sixty-eight cadets (61 males, 7 females) volunteered to have baseline physical fitness characteristics assessed, and fifty-five cadets (49 males, 6 females) completed further testing at weeks 8 and 16. The testing comprised of hand grip (strength), arm crank (upper body power), 30 sec Wingate (lower body power), sum of skinfolds and percentage body fat (body composition), 40-yard dash (sprint speed), 1-RM bench press (strength), T-test (agility), and sit-and-reach (flexibility). Additionally, cadets completed standardized state testing (push-ups, sit-ups, vertical jump, and half-mile shuttle run). The training program consisted of 1 hour sessions, 3 days/week including aerobic, plyometrics, body weight and resistance exercise. Significant changes were found in agility (p<0.01), upper body and lower body peak power (p<0.05), sit-ups (p<0.01), push-ups (p<0.05) across the first 8-weeks, and in agility (p<0.05), lower body peak power (p<0.05), sit-ups (p<0.01), push-ups (p<0.05), half mile shuttle run (p<0.01) across the full 16-weeks. However, none of the variables showed significant change across the second half of the program (weeks 8 to 16). A number of individual parameters of physical fitness showed evidence of improvement in the first 8-weeks, whereas none of the variables showed significant improvement in the second 8-weeks. This suggests modifications could be made to increase overall effectiveness of cadet physical training specifically after the 8-week mark.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Lecturer 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 54 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 40 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 63 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,085,272
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#2,479
of 7,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,037
of 336,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#52
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.