↓ Skip to main content

Isolation and characterisation of alveolar type II pneumocytes from adult bovine lung

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Isolation and characterisation of alveolar type II pneumocytes from adult bovine lung
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-30234-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Alveolar type II (ATII) cells play a key role as part of the distal lung epithelium, including roles in the innate immune response and as self-renewing progenitors to replace alveolar type I (ATI) cells during regeneration of the alveolar epithelium. Their secretion of surfactant protein helps to maintain homeostasis in the distal lung and exert protective, antimicrobial properties. Despite the cell's crucial roles, they remain difficult to study, in part due to inefficient and expensive isolation methods, a propensity to differentiate into alveolar type I cells in culture and susceptibility to fibroblast overgrowth from primary isolations. Published methods of isolation often require specialist technology, negatively impacting the development of in vitro models of disease, including bovine tuberculosis (BTB), a serious re-emerging disease in both animals and humans worldwide. We present here a simple and cost-effective method that may be utilised in the generation of bovine primary ATII cells. These exhibit an ATII phenotype in 2D and 3D culture in our studies and are conducive to further study of the role of ATII cells in bovine respiratory diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Master 10 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 68 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 66 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,895,264
of 33,834,589 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#26,035
of 181,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,110
of 370,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#595
of 3,752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,834,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.