↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Asp122 Mutation on the Hydride Transfer in E. coli DHFR Demonstrates the Goldilocks of Enzyme Flexibility

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Asp122 Mutation on the Hydride Transfer in E. coli DHFR Demonstrates the Goldilocks of Enzyme Flexibility
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, July 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b05556
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) catalyzes the reduction of dihydrofolate (DHF) to tetrahydrofolate (THF) in the presence of NADPH. The key hydride transfer step in the reaction is facilitated by a combination of enzyme active site preorganization and correlated protein motions in the Michaelis-Menten (E:NADPH:DHF) complex. The present theoretical study employs mutagenesis to examine the relation between structural and functional properties of the enzyme. We mutate Asp122 in Escherichia coli DHFR, which is a conserved amino acid in the DHFR family. The consequent effect of the mutation on enzyme catalysis is examined from an energetic, structural and short-time dynamic perspective. Our investigations suggest that the structural and short-time dynamic perturbations caused by Asp122X mutations (X = Asn, Ser, Ala) are along the reaction coordinate and lower the rate of hydride transfer. Importantly, analysis of the correlated and principle component motions in the enzyme suggest that the mutation alters the coupled motions that are present in the wild-type enzyme. In the case of D122N and D122S, the mutations inhibit coupled motion, whereas in the case of D122A, the mutation enhances coupled motion, although all mutations result in similar rate reduction. These results emphasize a Goldilocks principle of enzyme flexibility, that is, enzymes should neither be too rigid nor too flexible.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#28,615,159
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#13,504
of 17,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,922
of 371,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#131
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.