↓ Skip to main content

Satellite imagery characterizes local animal reservoir populations of Sin Nombre virus in the southwestern United States

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Satellite imagery characterizes local animal reservoir populations of Sin Nombre virus in the southwestern United States
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2002
DOI 10.1073/pnas.252617999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory E. Glass, Terry L. Yates, Joshua B. Fine, Timothy M. Shields, John B. Kendall, Andrew G. Hope, Cheryl A. Parmenter, C. J. Peters, Thomas G. Ksiazek, Chung-Sheng Li, Jonathan A. Patz, James N. Mills

Abstract

The relationship between the risk of hantaviral pulmonary syndrome (HPS), as estimated from satellite imagery, and local rodent populations was examined. HPS risk, predicted before rodent sampling, was highly associated with the abundance of Peromyscus maniculatus, the reservoir of Sin Nombre virus (SNV). P. maniculatus were common in high-risk sites, and populations in high-risk areas were skewed toward adult males, the subclass most frequently infected with SNV. In the year after an El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), captures of P. maniculatus increased only in high-risk areas. During 1998, few sites had infected mice, but by 1999, 1820 of the high-risk sites contained infected mice and the crude prevalence was 30.8%. Only 118 of the low-risk sites contained infected rodents, and the prevalence of infection was lower (8.3%). Satellite imagery identified environmental features associated with SNV transmission within its reservoir population, but at least 2 years of high-risk conditions were needed for SNV to reach high prevalence. Areas with persistently high-risk environmental conditions may serve as refugia for the survival of SNV in local mouse populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Environmental Science 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,219,054
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64,491
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,213
of 134,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#263
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.