↓ Skip to main content

Breaking significant news: The experience of clinical nurse specialists in cancer and palliative care

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Oncology Nursing, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Breaking significant news: The experience of clinical nurse specialists in cancer and palliative care
Published in
European Journal of Oncology Nursing, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of the research was to explore specialist cancer and palliative care nurses experience of delivering significant news to patients with advanced cancer. A qualitative phenomenological research study was conducted to capture nurses' experiences with the aim of understanding how cancer and palliative care clinical nurse specialists work towards disclosure of advanced and terminal cancer. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 clinical nurse specialists working in one acute NHS trust. Clinical nurse specialists were recruited from the following specialities: lung cancer, breast cancer, gynaecological cancer, upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer and palliative care. Four themes emerged from the data: importance of relationships; perspective taking; ways to break significant news; feeling prepared and putting yourself forward. The findings revealed that highly experienced clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) felt confident in their skills in delivering significant news and they report using patient centred communication to build a trusting relationship so significant news was easier to share with patients. CNSs were aware of guidelines and protocols for breaking significant and bad news but reported that they used guidelines flexibly and it was their years of clinical experience that enabled them to be effective in disclosing significant news. Some areas of disclosure were found to be challenging in particular news of a terminal prognosis to patients who were of a younger age. CNSs have become more directly involved in breaking significant news to those with advanced cancer by putting themselves forward and feeling confident in their skills.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Researcher 9 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 74 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 66 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Psychology 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 70 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,089,820
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Oncology Nursing
#436
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,159
of 294,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Oncology Nursing
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.