↓ Skip to main content

An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees
Published in
Ecological Indicators, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.048
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 48 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 47 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 11%
Engineering 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 65 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#19,278,525
of 28,871,759 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#2,767
of 4,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,359
of 455,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#81
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,871,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.