↓ Skip to main content

Morpholino‐driven gene editing: A new horizon for disease treatment and prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Morpholino‐driven gene editing: A new horizon for disease treatment and prevention
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/cpt.276
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of genetic and molecular biology tools permitting the connection of specific genes to their functions has accelerated our understanding of molecular pathways underlying health and disease. The resulting gains in knowledge have propelled gene targeting to the forefront of promising therapeutic strategies. Here we discuss the uniquely powerful and adaptable approach of morpholino-driven modification of normal and mutant gene expression as a pathway to health. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,268,429
of 28,043,368 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#1,138
of 5,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,353
of 297,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,043,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.