↓ Skip to main content

Ingredients Matter: How the Human Capital of Philanthropic and Traditional Venture Capital Differs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ingredients Matter: How the Human Capital of Philanthropic and Traditional Venture Capital Differs
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2901-0
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Lecturer 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 40 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 13%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,348,897
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,083
of 2,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,478
of 279,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#37
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.