↓ Skip to main content

New Functional Signatures for Understanding Melanoma Biology from Tumor Cell Lineage-Specific Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New Functional Signatures for Understanding Melanoma Biology from Tumor Cell Lineage-Specific Analysis
Published in
Cell Reports, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.037
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Molecular signatures specific to particular tumor types are required to design treatments for resistant tumors. However, it remains unclear whether tumors and corresponding cell lines used for drug development share such signatures. We developed similarity core analysis (SCA), a universal and unsupervised computational framework for extracting core molecular features common to tumors and cell lines. We applied SCA to mRNA/miRNA expression data from various sources, comparing melanoma cell lines and metastases. The signature obtained was associated with phenotypic characteristics in vitro, and the core genes CAPN3 and TRIM63 were implicated in melanoma cell migration/invasion. About 90% of the melanoma signature genes belong to an intrinsic network of transcription factors governing neural development (TFAP2A, DLX2, ALX1, MITF, PAX3, SOX10, LEF1, and GAS7) and miRNAs (211-5p, 221-3p, and 10a-5p). The SCA signature effectively discriminated between two subpopulations of melanoma patients differing in overall survival, and classified MEKi/BRAFi-resistant and -sensitive melanoma cell lines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Mathematics 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,447,483
of 32,013,898 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#8,602
of 15,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,601
of 311,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#119
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,013,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.