↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum to “Noncovalent bonding: Stacking interactions of chelate rings of transition metal complexes” [Coord. Chem. Rev. 345 (2017) 318–341]

Overview of attention for article published in Coordination Chemistry Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum to “Noncovalent bonding: Stacking interactions of chelate rings of transition metal complexes” [Coord. Chem. Rev. 345 (2017) 318–341]
Published in
Coordination Chemistry Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.06.009
Authors

Dušan P. Malenov, Goran V. Janjić, Vesna B. Medaković, Michael B. Hall, Snežana D. Zarić

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Coordination Chemistry Reviews
#1,790
of 3,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,270
of 445,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coordination Chemistry Reviews
#48
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.