Sexually transmitted infectious (STI) colitis often raises concern for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, we compare histologic features of IBD with STI colitis caused by syphilis and lymphogranuloma venereum.
The STI colitis group included 10 unique colorectal biopsy specimens in patients with clinically confirmed syphilis and/or lymphogranuloma venereum. The STI biopsy specimens were compared with patients matched for age, sex, and site with Crohn disease (n = 10) or ulcerative colitis (n = 10). All IBD controls had an established history of IBD (up to 276 months of follow-up, mean follow-up = 102 months).
Discriminating features (P < .05) of STI colitis included its exclusive identification in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men, anal pain, and anal discharge. STI colitis contained the triad of (1) minimal active chronic crypt centric damage, (2) a lack of mucosal eosinophilia, and (3) submucosal plasma cells, endothelial swelling, and perivascular plasma cells. Nondiscriminating features (P > .05) included rectal bleeding, endoscopic appearance, skip lesions, ulcerations, aphthoid lesions, granulomata, foreign body giant cells, neural hyperplasia, fibrosis, and lymphoid aggregates.
While STI colitis shares many overlapping features with IBD, histologic and clinical discriminating features may be helpful when confronted with that differential diagnosis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#10,846,634
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Pathology
#1,700
of 5,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,606
of 319,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Pathology
#27
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
