↓ Skip to main content

Microvascular Decompression of the Optic Nerve for Paroxysmal Phosphenes and Visual Field Deficit

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microvascular Decompression of the Optic Nerve for Paroxysmal Phosphenes and Visual Field Deficit
Published in
World Neurosurgery, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.094
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Microvascular decompression surgery is standard neurosurgical practice for treating trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. Most other cranial nerves have been decompressed for paroxysmal intermittent hyperactivity of the affected cranial nerve or in very longstanding compressions to treat cranial nerve hypo-functioning. We here describe a case of intermittent paroxysmal unilateral phosphenes (i.e., light flashes) associated with worsening visual field defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a sandwiched optic nerve/chiasm between an inferior compression of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and a superior compression of the anterior communicating artery (ACoA). He was successfully treated by a microvascular decompression and anterior clinoidectomy plus optic canal unroofing. This case report adds to the few previous case reports in combining 2 previously described techniques, i.e. microvascular decompression and anterior clinoidectomy plus optic canal unroofing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#4,625
of 7,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,357
of 291,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#41
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.