To identify trends in treatment and survival for patients with stage I glottic cancer and glottic carcinoma in situ (CIS).
The 18-registry SEER data were analyzed for CIS and stage I glottic cancer. Treatment variables and observed and relative survival were assessed separately for stage I and glottic CIS.
Among 14 025 cases of stage I glottic cancer identified from 1988 to 2012, radiation was the most common treatment for all eras. An increase in surgical treatment occurred with a decline in combination therapy. There were 3169 cases of glottic CIS, with surgery the most common initial treatment but with radiotherapy increasing across the years. Relative survival was similar for treatment type and era of diagnosis. Among the 3738 patients with glottic CIS, 5.4% went on to develop invasive glottic carcinoma of any stage, with invasive cancer more common in patients treated by surgery alone compared to radiation or surgery with radiation.
Despite changes in treatment modalities for CIS and stage I glottic cancer, there have not been significant changes in survival for CIS, with slightly improved survival for treatment with surgery alone. Patients treated with surgery alone had an increased rate of subsequent invasive cancer.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#24,999,353
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#1,854
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,073
of 297,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
