↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for Nurse-Related Barriers in Cancer Pain Management.

Overview of attention for article published in Oncology Nursing Forum, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interventions for Nurse-Related Barriers in Cancer Pain Management.
Published in
Oncology Nursing Forum, November 2015
DOI 10.1188/15.onf.634-641
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To describe the findings and critique the studies of interventions for nursing staff to improve pain management in adults with cancer.
. Publications were identified through database searches. Studies that describe interventions to overcome nurse-related barriers in cancer pain management practices were included in this review.
. Nine studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. All studies were experimental and conducted from 1993-2013. 
. Increase in knowledge, change of attitudes and behaviors, and good relationships with specialists were found to be influential in overcoming existing nursing barriers to pain management in cancer survivors. Educational interventions are more effective in increasing knowledge than in improving attitudes. Specialists were acknowledged as important resources and role models for nurses, particularly when trust was established between the two. 
. A number of interventions have been developed to address healthcare provider barriers. However, scarce literature exists on whether interventions that aim to overcome nurse-related barriers have been successful. This literature review provides critical insights on the effectiveness of interventions aimed to overcome barriers to effective pain management by nurses for adults with cancer. 
.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#31,097,336
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Oncology Nursing Forum
#915
of 996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,070
of 322,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncology Nursing Forum
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.