In patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI), patient selection, angiography, and embolization have contributed to low nonoperative management (NOM) failure rates. Despite these advances, some patients will fail NOM. We noted that a significant proportion of NOM failures had subcapsular hematomas (SCHs) identified on imaging. We sought to determine if there is a correlation between SCH and higher risk of NOM failure after BSI.
Our institutional trauma registry was queried for all patients with BSI during a 2-year period. Charts were reviewed to determine grade, presence of SCH, and outcome of NOM. Under current institutional protocol, all stable patients with BSI Grades III to V and those with contrast blush on computed tomography are referred for angiography and embolization. Failure of NOM was declared if splenectomy was required for bleeding after an initial plan of nonoperation.
From May 2012 to May 2014, 312 patients with BSI were identified. A total of 253 patients (81%) underwent NOM. Overall, 15 (5.9%) failed NOM. Of those undergoing NOM, 34 had SCH and 12 failed (35.3% vs. 1.5% without SCH, p = 0.0001). Failure rates in Grades 1 to 4 were 2.3%, 3.8%, 8.8%, and 19.2%, respectively. NOM failure rates in the subset with SCH for Grades I to IV were 20%, 25%, 30.8%, and 80%, respectively. These are significantly higher than patients without SCH in Grades II to IV (0%, p = 0.003; 2.3%, p = 0.008; and 4.8%, p = 0.016) and approach significance in Grade I (1.2%, p = 0.11). There were no SCHs and no failures of NOM in Grade V injuries.
The NOM failure rate of BSI patients with SCH is significantly higher than those without SCH. Patients with BSI Grades I to III slated for NOM must be observed as the failure rate approaches 30%. Splenectomy should be considered in patients with Grade IV BSI with SCH, as NOM failure rate is 80%.
Therapeutic, level III.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,324,887
of 33,945,077 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#2,225
of 5,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,529
of 443,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#44
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,945,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
