↓ Skip to main content

Heterobimetallic Ti/Co Complexes That Promote Catalytic N–N Bond Cleavage

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Heterobimetallic Ti/Co Complexes That Promote Catalytic N–N Bond Cleavage
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, October 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01962
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Treatment of the tris(phosphinoamide) titanium precursor ClTi(XylNP(i)Pr2)3 (1) with CoI2 leads to the heterobimetallic complex (η(2)-(i)Pr2PNXyl)Ti(XylNP(i)Pr2)2(μ-Cl)CoI (2). One-electron reduction of 2 affords (η(2)-(i)Pr2PNXyl)Ti(XylNP(i)Pr2)2CoI (3), which can be reduced by another electron under dinitrogen to generate the reduced diamagnetic complex (THF)Ti(XylNP(i)Pr2)3CoN2 (4). The removal of the dinitrogen ligand from 4 under vacuum affords (THF)Ti(XylNP(i)Pr2)3Co (5), which features a Ti-Co triple bond. Treatment of 4 with hydrazine or methyl hydrazine results in N-N bond cleavage and affords the new diamagnetic complexes (L)Ti(XylNP(i)Pr2)3CoN2 (L = NH3 (6), MeNH2 (7)). Complexes 4, 5, and 6 have been shown to catalyze the disproportionation of hydrazine into ammonia and dinitrogen gas through a mechanism involving a diazene intermediate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 42 76%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,957,995
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#10,882
of 21,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,663
of 283,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#67
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,676 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.