↓ Skip to main content

Immunohistochemical Method and Histopathology Judging for the Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunohistochemical Method and Histopathology Judging for the Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4)
Published in
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, August 2018
DOI 10.1093/jnen/nly056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas G Beach, Geidy E Serrano, Thomas Kremer, Marta Canamero, Sebastian Dziadek, Hadassah Sade, Pascal Derkinderen, Anne-Gaëlle Corbillé, Franck Letournel, David G Munoz, Charles L White, Julie Schneider, John F Crary, Lucia I Sue, Charles H Adler, Michael J Glass, Anthony J Intorcia, Jessica E Walker, Tatiana Foroud, Christopher S Coffey, Dixie Ecklund, Holly Riss, Jennifer Goßmann, Fatima König, Catherine M Kopil, Vanessa Arnedo, Lindsey Riley, Carly Linder, Kuldip D Dave, Danna Jennings, John Seibyl, Brit Mollenhauer, Lana Chahine, Lindsey Guilmette, David Russell, Chaucer Noyes-Lloyd, Colleen Mitchell, Danielle Smith, Madeline Potter, Rose Case, David Lott, Amy Duffy, Penelope Hogarth, Madeline Cresswell, Rizwan Akhtar, Rachael Purri, Amy Amara, Courtney Blair, Ali Keshavarzian, Connie Marras, Naomi Visanji, Brandon Rothberg, Vikash Oza

Abstract

Immunohistochemical (IHC) α-synuclein (Asyn) pathology in peripheral biopsies may be a biomarker of Parkinson disease (PD). The multi-center Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4) is evaluating IHC Asyn pathology within skin, colon and submandibular gland biopsies from 60 PD and 20 control subjects. Asyn pathology is being evaluated by a blinded panel of specially trained neuropathologists. Preliminary work assessed 2 candidate immunoperoxidase methods using a set of PD and control autopsy-derived sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks of the 3 tissues. Both methods had 100% specificity; one, utilizing the 5C12 monoclonal antibody, was more sensitive in skin (67% vs 33%), and was chosen for further use in S4. Four trainee neuropathologists were trained to perform S4 histopathology readings; in subsequent testing, their scoring was compared to that of the trainer neuropathologist on both glass slides and digital images. Specificity and sensitivity were both close to 100% with all readers in all tissue types on both glass slides and digital images except for skin, where sensitivity averaged 75% with digital images and 83.5% with glass slides. Semiquantitative (0-3) density score agreement between trainees and trainer averaged 67% for glass slides and 62% for digital images.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Other 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 32 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,876,504
of 34,259,606 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
#372
of 2,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,168
of 372,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,259,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.