↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mixed‐methods content and sentiment analysis of adolescents’ voice diaries describing daily experiences with asthma and self‐management decision‐making
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/cea.13250
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Accurate symptom assessment remains challenging in teen populations. Little is known of usual symptom/response patterns, and self-reported paper diaries have traditionally low compliance rates. Therefore, we used concurrent digital voice-diaries to capture daily asthma experiences. (1) To qualitatively explore usual symptom patterns and self-management responses; and (2) to quantitatively explore relationships between symptom severity and sentiment scores (a marker of emotional response to events). Fourteen minority and non-minority teenagers (age 13-17) with controlled (50%) and uncontrolled asthma used digital recorders to report about their asthma once daily over 14 days. Dairy entries were coded for symptom frequency, severity, type, and self-management responses, while sentiment analysis was used to evaluate the emotional valence of diary entries and to explore whether increased symptom levels correlated with greater negative sentiment. Symptom frequency and severity recorded in voice-diaries was much higher than teens indicated at baseline, and was discordant with clinical assessments of asthma control. Of 175 entries, teens had symptoms 69.1% of days (121/175) and severe symptoms on one-third of these. Atypical symptoms (coughing, throat-clearing) were reported twice as often as traditional symptoms (wheezing, chest tightness), and often not recognized as asthma, but rather attributed to being "sick" (25.6% of symptom days). Teens frequently minimized symptoms, used rescue and controller medication inconsistently, and resorted to alternative strategies to manage symptoms. Sentiment was not significantly correlated with assessed control (β=0.14, p=0.28), but for teens reporting severe symptoms, sentiment scores decreased by 0.31 relative to teens without symptoms (P=0.006). Teens may minimize symptoms and have greater symptom frequency and severity than is recognized by themselves or providers. Screening for specific symptoms including coughing, throat-clearing, and respiratory illness may be needed to identify those experiencing burden from asthma. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 43 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 42 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,636,262
of 31,712,529 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#1,396
of 4,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,046
of 368,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,712,529 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.