↓ Skip to main content

Glycogen Synthesis in Muscle Fibers during Active Recovery from Intense Exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Glycogen Synthesis in Muscle Fibers during Active Recovery from Intense Exercise
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, April 2003
DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000058436.46584.8e
Pubmed ID
Authors

TIMOTHY J. FAIRCHILD, ALEX A. ARMSTRONG, ARJUN RAO, HAWK LIU, STEVE LAWRENCE, PAUL A. FOURNIER

Abstract

There is evidence that active recovery impairs glycogen repletion in skeletal muscles of fasted individuals. Our main goal was to examine the impact of active recovery on the glycogen stores of the different muscle fiber types. Eight endurance-trained individuals cycled for 2.5 min at 130% [OV0312]O(2peak) followed by a 30-s all-out cycling sprint. After exercise, the participants were subjected to either a passive recovery or an active recovery protocol that consisted of pedalling for 45 min at 40% [OV0312]O(2peak). During active recovery, blood lactate and pH returned more rapidly toward preexercise levels than during passive recovery. In contrast, average muscle glycogen content remained at stable levels during active recovery (209 +/- 32 and 202 +/- 30 mmol.kg-1 at 0 and 45 min of recovery, respectively) but increased significantly in response to passive recovery (from 185 +/- 27 to 283 +/- 42 mmol.kg-1). The pattern of change in periodic acid-Schiff staining intensity across muscle fibers suggests that the impact of active recovery on average muscle glycogen content is different from that observed at the levels of the individual muscle fibers, with active recovery having no effect on glycogen resynthesis in Type II muscle fibers but causing glycogen breakdown in Type I muscle fibers. Although active recovery was also associated with higher plasma catecholamines and lower insulin levels, such an unfavorable hormonal environment had no effect on glycogen resynthesis in Type II muscle fibers. Active recovery in comparison to passive recovery does not affect glycogen resynthesis in Type II muscle fibers despite being associated with an unfavorable hormonal environment but results in a marked glycogen mobilization in Type I muscle fibers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 6 4%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 148 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 80 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#24,814,475
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#7,070
of 8,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,186
of 91,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#39
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.