↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inorganic nitrate supplementation enhances functional capacity and lower-limb microvascular reactivity in patients with peripheral artery disease
Published in
Nitric Oxide, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.niox.2018.08.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is characterized by functional and vascular impairments as well as elevated levels of inflammation which are associated with reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Inorganic nitrate supplementation boosts NO bioavailability potentially improving functional and vasodilatory capacities and may reduce inflammation. Twenty-one patients with PAD were randomly assigned to sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or placebo supplementation groups for eight-weeks. Outcome measures included a 6-min walk test (6 MWT), blood flow and vasodilator function in the forearm and calf, as well as plasma inflammatory and adhesion biomarker concentrations. NaNO3 elevated plasma nitrate (32.3 ± 20.0 to 379.8 ± 204.6 μM) and nitrite (192.2 ± 51.8 to 353.1 ± 134.2 nM), improved 6 MWT performance (387 ± 90 to 425 ± 82 m), peak calf blood flow (BFPeak; 11.6 ± 4.9 to 14.1 ± 5.1 mL/dL tissue/min), and peak calf vascular conductance (VCPeak; 11.1 ± 4.3 to 14.2 ± 4.9 mL/dL tissue/min/mmHg) (p < 0.05 for all). Improvements in calf BFPeak (r = 0.70, p < 0.05) and VCPeak (r = 0.61, p < 0.05) correlated with changes in 6 MWT distance. Placebo supplementation did not change plasma nitrate or nitrite, 6 MWT, calf BFPeak, or calf VCPeak. Forearm vascular function nor inflammatory and adhesion biomarker concentrations changed in either group. Eight-weeks of NaNO3 supplementation improves vasodilatory capacity in the lower-limbs of patients with PAD, which correlated with improvement in functional capacity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 24%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Sports and Recreations 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nitric Oxide
#598
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,692
of 340,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nitric Oxide
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.