↓ Skip to main content

Referrals and Treatment Completion for Prescription Opioid Admissions: Five Years of National Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Referrals and Treatment Completion for Prescription Opioid Admissions: Five Years of National Data
Published in
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.07.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examines sources of referral for prescription opioid admission to substance use disorder treatment facilities and their relative completion success rates using secondary analysis of an existing data set (treatment episode datasets-discharge). Five years of data from public and private treatment facilities were extracted for client discharges with no prior treatment (N=2,909,884). Healthcare professionals account for very few referrals to treatment (<10%). Prescription opioid clients referred into treatment had lower treatment success compared to other substance clients and when referred by healthcare providers had lower success rates (OR=0.72, 95% CI 0.70-0.75) than clients from other referral sources. Fewer treatment referrals for prescription opioid misuse by healthcare providers and lower success rates are significant and timely findings due to the prevalence of prescription opioid misuse. Healthcare providers are well positioned to refer early for prescription opioid misuse and continue support of their patients during treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Professor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#9,456,078
of 27,784,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#1,254
of 2,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,458
of 277,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#22
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,784,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.