↓ Skip to main content

Gluten‐free Sourdough Wheat Baked Goods Appear Safe for Young Celiac Patients: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
22 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gluten‐free Sourdough Wheat Baked Goods Appear Safe for Young Celiac Patients: A Pilot Study
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, December 2010
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3181f22ba4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study was aimed at showing the safety, for young patients with celiac disease (CD), of sweet baked goods made of wheat flour, which was rendered gluten-free during sourdough fermentation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 48 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Chemistry 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 55 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2026.
All research outputs
#987,925
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#89
of 7,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,955
of 255,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.