↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of PermaNet® 2.0 and PermaNet® 3.0 against insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae in experimental huts in Côte d'Ivoire

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of PermaNet® 2.0 and PermaNet® 3.0 against insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae in experimental huts in Côte d'Ivoire
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin G Koudou, Alphonsine A Koffi, David Malone, Janet Hemingway

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Senegal 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Researcher 20 23%
Student > Master 17 20%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,453
of 5,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,584
of 115,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.